OilAuthority.com

Earthquake

Earthquake in the oil and gas context refers to seismic ground motion events — either naturally occurring tectonic earthquakes that affect the design and operation of upstream facilities, pipelines, and offshore platforms, or induced seismic events triggered by oil and gas operations such as high-volume wastewater disposal by injection into deep disposal wells, hydraulic fracturing, or reservoir depletion, with both types requiring risk assessment, facility design standards, and operational protocols to protect personnel, assets, and the public.

Key Takeaways

  • Induced seismicity associated with oil and gas operations is primarily linked to high-volume disposal of produced water (brine) into deep saltwater disposal (SWD) wells — the injected water increases pore pressure in the disposal formation, reduces effective stress on nearby faults, and can reactivate pre-existing faults if the pressure front reaches them, causing earthquakes that can range from barely perceptible (magnitude 1-2) to damaging (magnitude 4-5+).
  • Hydraulic fracturing itself generates very small induced seismic events (typically less than magnitude 2) as fluid injection propagates fractures in the target formation; rarely, fracturing operations create felt earthquakes (magnitude 3+) when fractures intersect or reactivate a fault, particularly in areas where in-situ stress is close to the failure threshold on nearby faults.
  • Traffic light protocols (TLPs) are the primary regulatory tool for managing induced seismicity risk in oil and gas operations — establishing threshold magnitudes at which operations must slow (yellow light), pause (amber/orange), or permanently stop (red light) while seismicity is assessed, with different jurisdictions specifying different magnitude thresholds.
  • Offshore platforms and onshore facilities in seismically active regions (Gulf of Mexico, Pacific Rim, Middle East) must be designed to the seismic hazard defined by site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), with design spectra incorporated into structural engineering per API RP 2EQ (offshore structures), ASCE 7, or equivalent standards.
  • The distinction between induced and natural earthquakes is scientifically and legally significant — attributing a damaging earthquake to oil and gas operations requires establishing temporal and spatial correlation with injection activity, a credible physical mechanism (fault reactivation by pore pressure change), and the absence of an equally plausible natural explanation.

Fast Facts

Oklahoma experienced a dramatic increase in earthquake frequency beginning around 2009-2010, coinciding with rapid growth in produced water disposal from Midcontinent oil production. By 2015, Oklahoma had more magnitude 3+ earthquakes per year than California — a reversal of the historic norm. The majority were attributed to high-volume saltwater disposal rather than hydraulic fracturing directly. Following implementation of magnitude-based traffic light protocols and reductions in disposal volumes, Oklahoma earthquake rates declined significantly after 2015. The 2011 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake (magnitude 5.6) caused structural damage to residences and was one of the largest induced seismic events ever recorded in North America.

What Is an Earthquake in the Oil and Gas Context?

Earthquakes in oil and gas operations arise from two distinct sources: natural tectonic seismicity that defines the hazard environment for facility siting and design, and induced seismicity where subsurface pressure changes from injection or production operations alter the stress state on pre-existing faults and trigger seismic slip. Both require systematic management, but induced seismicity has emerged as a critical public, regulatory, and operational concern in unconventional oil and gas producing regions over the past two decades.

Natural seismicity is an environmental hazard that must be incorporated into the design of all major oil and gas infrastructure — offshore platforms, compressor stations, LNG terminals, refineries, and long-distance pipelines. The design philosophy uses probabilistic seismic hazard analysis to characterize the expected ground motions at a site over a defined return period and translates these into structural design requirements. In seismically active areas such as southern California, coastal Alaska, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific, natural seismicity is a primary design driver for oil and gas facilities.

Induced seismicity has become prominent in unconventional oil and gas development, particularly in the United States and Canada, where large volumes of produced water from hydraulic fracturing completions are disposed of by injection into deep saltwater disposal wells. Unlike natural earthquakes that reflect long-term tectonic loading, induced earthquakes can be controlled by adjusting injection rates, volumes, or well locations — a capability that regulators have translated into operational protocols with traffic light criteria.

Induced Seismicity Mechanisms and Risk Management

The mechanism linking saltwater disposal to induced seismicity is pore pressure diffusion: injection of produced water at high rates and volumes increases fluid pressure in the disposal formation. If this pressure front migrates laterally along permeable pathways and reaches a fault that is already close to shear failure under the existing in-situ stress, the increased pore pressure reduces the effective normal stress on the fault surface, lowering the shear strength and potentially triggering slip. The time delay between injection and earthquake occurrence reflects the time for the pressure front to diffuse from the injection well to the fault.

Risk mitigation strategies include: pre-injection characterization of faults near the disposal well using seismic surveys and state geological surveys; setting injection rate and pressure limits that restrict the pressure front radius; monitoring local seismic activity through networks of seismometers installed before and during operations; and implementing traffic light protocols that prescribe operational responses to observed seismicity.

Hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity operates through a related but distinct mechanism: direct fluid injection into low-permeability reservoir rock at pressures sufficient to propagate hydraulic fractures. In rare cases, hydraulic fractures propagate into or near pre-existing faults, directly pressurizing the fault surface and causing rupture. This is less common than disposal-induced seismicity because fracturing fluid volumes are smaller and operations are shorter-duration, but has occurred in several cases in western Canada and the UK.

Earthquake and Induced Seismicity Across International Jurisdictions

Canada (AER / BC Energy Regulator): The AER's Subsurface Order No. 2 and Induced Seismicity Requirements for Hydraulic Fracturing apply traffic light protocols with a red-light threshold of magnitude 4.0 for hydraulic fracturing operations in the Duvernay and other formations. AER has investigated multiple cases of induced seismicity in the Fox Creek area associated with hydraulic fracturing in the Duvernay Formation, including a magnitude 4.4 event in 2015. The BC Energy Regulator similarly requires traffic light protocols for hydraulic fracturing under its Induced Seismicity Requirements, with operations required to cease and report at magnitude 4.0 or above. Both regulators require pre-operational seismic baseline surveys and real-time seismic monitoring networks for large hydraulic fracturing programs.

United States (USGS / EPA / State regulators): The USGS publishes annual induced seismicity hazard maps that incorporate induced seismicity probability for oil and gas producing states. Oklahoma's Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) and the Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS) jointly administer a comprehensive induced seismicity monitoring and response program with traffic light protocols for saltwater disposal wells in areas of elevated seismicity. EPA's Underground Injection Control (UIC) Class II well regulations require permitting of disposal wells but do not explicitly mandate traffic light protocols — that responsibility falls to state oil and gas regulators. PHMSA requires seismic design standards for pipeline facilities in seismic zones.

Norway (Sodir / NPD): The Norwegian Continental Shelf is not significantly affected by injection-induced seismicity because NCS produced water is generally re-injected into the reservoir rather than into unrelated disposal formations, limiting the volume and pressure changes that drive induced seismicity. Natural seismicity on the NCS is low to moderate, and offshore structures are designed to Norwegian NORSOK N-003 and ISO 19901-2 seismic design standards. PSA Norway oversees earthquake risk management for NCS installations through its facility safety regulations, which require that structural integrity under design-basis seismic loading be demonstrated in the safety case.

Middle East (Saudi Aramco): The Arabian Peninsula experiences moderate natural seismicity associated with the Red Sea rift system and the Zagros fold belt in Iran and Iraq. Saudi Aramco's onshore and offshore facilities are designed to the seismic hazard defined by regional PSHA studies, with Aramco engineering standards referencing ASCE 7 and API RP 2EQ for seismic design. The very large produced water reinjection operations associated with Aramco's reservoir pressure maintenance programs involve injection into the reservoir rather than unrelated disposal formations, and induced seismicity monitoring is incorporated into Aramco's reservoir management programs for major fields.

In the oil and gas context, earthquake is also referred to as seismic event, induced seismic event, or felt seismic event (for events above the human perception threshold). Related terms include induced seismicity, traffic light protocol, saltwater disposal (SWD), pore pressure, fault reactivation, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), and produced water. Microseismic monitoring, used during hydraulic fracturing to map fracture propagation, detects very small seismic events (magnitude -2 to 0) that are far below human perception and distinct from the felt induced earthquakes that are the subject of regulatory concern.

Tip: When planning a high-volume saltwater disposal well in an area with known faults, commission a fault proximity assessment from a geomechanics specialist before permitting — state and provincial geological surveys typically have mapped fault systems that can be used to estimate the minimum distance between the proposed injection zone and any mapped fault. The critical variable is not the distance at surface but the distance at the depth of the disposal formation, which may be different depending on fault dip. A disposal well located 10 km from a mapped fault surface trace may be much closer to that fault at injection depth if the fault dips toward the injection zone. Early fault proximity assessment is far less expensive than a post-injection induced seismicity event that requires operational shutdown and regulatory investigation.

FAQ

How do regulators determine whether an earthquake was induced by oil and gas operations?
Attribution of induced seismicity involves multiple lines of evidence: spatial correlation (the earthquake occurred within a distance consistent with pressure diffusion from the injection well, typically within 10-20 km), temporal correlation (the earthquake occurred after injection began, with a plausible time delay for pressure diffusion to reach the fault), magnitude and depth consistency (shallow earthquakes at injection depths are more likely to be induced), and the absence of a compelling natural explanation. Regulators use USGS or equivalent seismic monitoring networks to locate earthquakes, compare the locations to known injection wells, and assess the correlation. Scientific standards for attribution require more rigorous analysis including geomechanical modeling of pressure diffusion and fault stability, but regulatory decisions are typically made on the balance of correlative evidence.

Browse the Oil and Gas Glossary