
VLCC Day Rates Hold $100K as Hormuz Crawls
Supertanker rates stick at $100,000 per day as Hormuz transits run 5 to 6 ships daily, 96% below the 138-ship norm. War risk premiums sit above 2%.
Very Large Crude Carrier day rates have stabilized at roughly $100,000 per day in afternoon trading on May 22, 2026, roughly double the spot levels for the same week of 2025, as Strait of Hormuz transit traffic remains a small fraction of its prewar baseline. The Baltic Exchange's US Gulf-to-China index printed at $91,731 per day midweek and its West Africa-to-China index at $99,407 per day, according to Lloyd's List trade-press data. Behind those headline rates is a shipping market that has effectively rerouted itself around the chokepoint between Iran and Oman that normally carries 21 to 22 million barrels per day of crude.
Brent crude was trading at $105.42 per barrel on the ICE front-month contract in afternoon trading on May 22 as of approximately 13:00 MT, with WTI at $98.27 per barrel on the CME. Both benchmarks have held a roughly $7 premium versus pre-Hormuz-crisis levels, but the deeper market story sits in tanker chartering desks and marine insurers' Lloyd's broker slips, where the actual cost of moving barrels has reshaped delivered crude economics for Asian refiners.
Hormuz transits 96 percent below historical baseline
Strait of Hormuz transits ran at just 6 vessels on May 3 and 5 vessels on May 4, the most recent days for which Lloyd's List published a count, against the historical average of approximately 138 transits per day. That is a 96 percent drop in throughput days, although individual cargoes are typically larger and voyages longer as charterers reroute to circumvent the Gulf entirely.
Global crude exports on VLCCs have averaged 14.4 million bpd over the past eight weeks, down 8.1 million bpd or 36 percent versus prewar levels per Lloyd's List analysis. The VLCC share of seaborne crude exports has fallen to roughly 40 percent from 52 percent in the January 2025 to February 2026 window, with Suezmax and Aframax tonnage absorbing a larger share of the redirected flow at higher unit cost per barrel.
War risk premiums sit at 8 times prewar baseline
Marine war risk insurance for Gulf transits has eased from the March 2026 peaks but remains structurally elevated. Additional war risk premiums had fallen to roughly 1 percent of Hull and Machinery value by March 30, down from about 2.5 percent earlier in March, with successful Hormuz transits paying around 0.8 percent after a no-claims bonus. That floor still sits 6 to 8 times above the 0.10 to 0.15 percent range that prevailed before the conflict began, according to Howden Re and Caixin Global broker data.
In dollar terms, industry estimates put current war risk premiums at $3 million to $8 million per single VLCC transit, against roughly $200,000 to $300,000 before March. For a fully loaded 2 million-barrel VLCC, the insurance line alone now adds $1.50 to $4.00 per barrel of incremental landed cost on top of the elevated charter rate. Combine the day-rate premium of approximately $50,000 per day (over prewar $50,000 levels) across a 45-day round trip and the freight component adds another $1.10 per barrel.
Information gain: derived total freight uplift on Gulf-to-China cargoes
Putting those layers together, the all-in delivered-cost premium for a Gulf-to-China VLCC cargo today versus the same route in January 2025 is roughly $2.50 to $5.00 per barrel, depending on charter type and underwriter. That uplift is being absorbed unevenly. Asian refiners with term contracts at fixed delivered-cost indexation have been less exposed; spot buyers including Chinese teapot refineries and India's smaller importers have paid the full incremental cost or switched to West African and Latin American grades, which is itself part of why the Brent-Dubai exchange-for-swap spread has compressed by roughly $1.20 per barrel since March, per Argus assessments.
Aramco, ADNOC and Iraq the largest disrupted shippers
Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (a parent of TotalEnergies-partnered Murban grade) and Iraq's State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO) are the three largest VLCC loaders out of Gulf terminals, collectively responsible for over 12 million bpd of normal Hormuz throughput. ADNOC announced last week a $55 billion capital program premised on growing UAE crude capacity to 6 million bpd by 2032, but the company has not yet disclosed how its committed Asian shipper base is being served through the disruption. Iraq has redirected meaningful volumes through the Ceyhan pipeline to the Mediterranean, although Ceyhan's nameplate of 1.6 million bpd caps that release valve well below Iraqi production levels of approximately 4.3 million bpd.
For US producers, the Hormuz dislocation has produced a modest but persistent tailwind. WTI-Brent has narrowed to roughly $7 per barrel today versus a $10 to $12 spread that held for most of 2025, reflecting both stronger US Gulf Coast bid for VLCC tonnage (where premiums are lower than Gulf-of-Persia routes) and direct substitution of US crude into Asia. ExxonMobil, Chevron Corporation and other US Gulf exporters have benefitted from the rebalance, although total US crude exports remain capped near 4.5 million bpd by terminal infrastructure.
What the rate stabilization signals
VLCC day rates settling at $100,000 per day rather than continuing toward the $400,000-plus levels seen in mid-March suggests the market has now priced an indefinite Hormuz disruption rather than an imminent escalation or imminent ceasefire. Forward freight agreements out to Q3 2026 are trading at roughly $95,000 to $105,000 per day on Baltic Exchange screens, indicating little expectation of normalization before late 2026 at earliest. That medium-term pricing is what is putting structural pressure on shipper netbacks and supporting the elevated Brent flat-price level, even as headline crude inventories in the US fell by 7.9 million barrels for the week ending May 15 per EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report data.
Published by Oil Authority, edited by Adam Humphreys
Submit a Correction
Spotted a factual error? Free account required to submit a correction.


