Aerial photograph of the Golden Pass LNG export terminal at Sabine Pass, Texas, showing liquefaction trains and marine berths
Golden Pass LNG
LNG / Natural Gas·Monday, June 15, 2026

Golden Pass LNG Ships First Cargo for QatarEnergy as Hormuz Crisis Tests US-Gulf Supply Strategy

QatarEnergy loaded its first Golden Pass LNG cargo on April 22 as the Hormuz closure peaked, but Train 1 ramp struggles limited the supply hedge.

Golden Pass LNG, the joint venture between QatarEnergy (70%) and ExxonMobil (30%) at Sabine Pass, Texas, shipped its first LNG cargo on April 22, 2026, some 23 days after Train 1 achieved initial production in late March. The Al-Qaiyyah, a 174,000-cubic-meter LNG carrier built in South Korea, loaded the inaugural shipment and departed for delivery buyers. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright toured the terminal on June 1 to mark the milestone.

Golden Pass is the ninth US LNG export terminal to achieve first cargo, per the US Energy Information Administration's record of domestic export infrastructure. When all three trains reach full nominal output, the facility will deliver 2.0 billion cubic feet per day of LNG. That output would rank Golden Pass third among US projects by nameplate capacity, behind Sabine Pass at 3.6 Bcf per day and Plaquemines LNG at 2.6 Bcf per day. Train 2 is targeted for the second half of 2026 and Train 3 for the first half of 2027.

Train 1 Ramp Struggles Limit Near-Term Output

Train 1 has not reached rated capacity in the roughly two months since its first cargo, according to Natural Gas Intelligence. The publication reported in mid-June 2026 that feedgas flows to Golden Pass have averaged a fraction of the train's rated output as unplanned maintenance hampers the ramp-up. Each train carries a nominal nameplate of 0.7 billion cubic feet per day and a peak rating of 0.8 Bcf per day. East Daley Analytics projected early in the startup phase that feedgas demand to Train 1 would likely approach 800 million cubic feet per day at higher utilization rates in the second quarter of 2026.

Those levels have not materialized, limiting the volume of LNG Golden Pass has been able to place in the market during a period of tight global supply. The ramp setback is separate from the project's construction history: Zachry Holdings and joint venture partner Chiyoda Corporation filed for financial restructuring in 2024, forcing owners to revise the construction program and push startup targets later. The April 2026 first cargo reflects the project's ultimate delivery of the liquefaction infrastructure.

The Hormuz Crisis and Golden Pass Timing

The Strait of Hormuz closed to most shipping on March 2, 2026, after Iran responded to US and Israeli airstrikes that began on February 28. Persian Gulf LNG shipments fell an estimated 99% from pre-conflict levels during the 104-day closure, per shipping data tracking the 2026 Hormuz campaign. Golden Pass achieved first LNG production in late March, providing QatarEnergy with a non-Hormuz export outlet roughly three weeks into the closure.

The hedge proved partial in practice. QatarEnergy holds a 70% offtake position in Golden Pass output, meaning that share of what Train 1 ships flows under QatarEnergy Trading contracts. During the Hormuz closure, Qatar's LNG exports through Ras Laffan were effectively halted as Persian Gulf shipping fell to near zero. Train 1 ramp constraints meant Golden Pass delivered below its potential contribution to offset that disruption. The US-Iran framework announced June 14 to reopen the strait changes the calculus: QatarEnergy now holds two simultaneous export routes once Gulf transit resumes.

Commercial Stakes: The Henry Hub-JKM Spread

The spread between US and Asian gas benchmarks drives the commercial case for Golden Pass. Henry Hub natural gas settled at $3.10 per million BTU for the week of June 8-12, per EIA data. The Platts Japan-Korea Marker settled at $18.86 per million BTU on June 12, 2026, a gross spread of $15.76 per million BTU. After subtracting standard liquefaction costs of $2.50 per million BTU and shipping to Asian buyers at $4.00, the calculated net margin reaches $9.26 per million BTU.

At Train 1's nominal 0.7 billion cubic feet per day at full capacity, the net spread at current prices calculates to $6.5 million per day. When all three trains reach full output at 2.0 Bcf per day, the combined daily net margin reaches $18.5 million, or $6.76 billion annualized at current price levels. Those figures represent gross spread economics before corporate costs, contract structures, and QatarEnergy Trading's downstream obligations to buyers under long-term supply agreements.

Policy Context and US Export Trajectory

Energy Secretary Wright's June 1 visit to Golden Pass signaled the administration's positioning of LNG exports as a strategic energy security tool. The EIA's June 9 Short-Term Energy Outlook forecast US LNG exports at 17.2 billion cubic feet per day for 2026, rising to 18.6 billion cubic feet per day in 2027. The EIA separately noted that US natural gas exports are on track to grow roughly 30% by 2027 as new facilities ramp up, with Golden Pass a central part of that projection. Golden Pass's three-train nominal output of 2.0 Bcf per day represents roughly 11% of the 2027 export forecast once fully ramped.

The next data milestone for the project is Train 2 startup, expected in the second half of 2026. Markets will also watch Thursday and Friday's pipeline flow data around Sabine Pass for signs that Train 1 feedgas utilization has improved from the fraction-of-capacity levels reported in recent weeks. The EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report, due June 17, will offer a parallel read on domestic US supply tightness.

Sources and methodology

Oil Authority synthesis: Net margin calculation ($9.26 per million BTU, $18.5 million per day at three-train full capacity) derived from June 12 Platts JKM ($18.86/MMBtu), EIA Henry Hub ($3.10/MMBtu for week of June 8-12), and standard industry liquefaction and shipping cost estimates. QatarEnergy dual-route strategy mapped across Golden Pass (70% offtake) and Qatar Ras Laffan exports, not reported in the source wires.

Published by Oil Authority, edited by Adam Humphreys

Submit a Correction

Spotted a factual error? Free account required to submit a correction.